Tsuta là hiệu ramen đầu tiên nhận được sao Michelin, cửa hàng nhận được sao ở bên Nhật lận. Tụi mình chưa có cơ hội đi Nhật, nghe nói hiệu này mở nhà hàng chi nhánh ở Singapore nên đi ăn thử ramen được sao Michelin thực sự khác biệt như thế nào.
Vì mình đã nói là mì ramen nhưng bảng hiệu quán lại nhắc đến Soba nên mình muốn nói sơ 1 chút. Ramen là món mì có nguồn gốc từ Trung Quốc, được Nhật du nhập vào nước họ, xuất phát điểm nó chỉ là món bình dân, bán ở các xe lề đường (giống mì gõ bên mình), sau được nâng cấp lên bán ở các nhà hàng, giá thành cũng cao. Người Nhật hay sử dụng từ soba để gọi chung cho món mì. Từ soba phổ biến thường gợi nhớ đến món mì soba (làm từ kiều mạch), đối với dân nước ngoài (như tụi mình), thường gọi ramen (làm từ bột mì) và soba (làm từ kiều mạch) để dễ phân biệt.
Địa chỉ:
Jewel Changi Airport, 78 Airport Boulevard, #02-242, 819666
Sau đây là 1 vài đánh giá của tụi mình:
Vị trí: Jewel là khu mua sắm khá mới của Singapore, mở chừng 2-3 năm gần đây trong sân bay Changi. Nó nằm ở T1, ở sân bay Changi hướng dẫn rất rõ nên không khó để đi qua Jewel đâu, quán này nằm ở tầng 2, mình nhớ là khá gần cửa hàng Muji ah.
Không gian: nhìn khá rộng rãi, không sử dụng vách ngăn nhiều (chắc để tiết kiệm diện tích, bày thêm nhiều bàn hơn), sáng sủa, nhã. Tụi mình ăn lúc 6-7h tối thì đông nghẹt, không biết các giờ khác thế nào. Chủ yếu là các bàn nhỏ nhỏ (đủ cho 2 người), khoảng cách giữa các bàn rất gần nhau nên ngồi vô cảm giác giống bị bao vây. Quán làm bếp mở, có chỗ ngồi ngay quầy, chỗ này thấy thích hợp ai đi ăn 1 mình hơn.
Menu: chủ yếu vị truffle, phân thành shoyu và shio. Mình thấy không có nhiều sự lựa chọn lắm đâu. Nước thì có vài ba loại trà và 1 loại nước khoáng. Menu nhìn tối giản lắm.
Phục vụ: bình thường, vì quá là đông nên món lên chậm, cả nước cũng phải chờ 1 lúc, ai đói chắc sẽ dễ quạu và không nên ăn ở đây khi đang đói cồn cào.
Món ăn:
Tụi mình khuyên là không nên gọi nước, vì giá cao, lúc nhân viên bưng nước ra nhìn kích cỡ của nó rất hụt hẫng so với giá tiền. Ly trà xanh bạc hà uống cũng được nhưng quá nhỏ, không thấm vào đâu. Nếu khát quá thì bạn gọi nước khoáng có ga như Badoit uống đỡ cũng ok, chai khá đẹp, vị thì mình chịu, không thấy khác biệt gì các hiệu khác (Hiệu Badoit này của Pháp).
S.mint green tea – 3.8S$ 
Badoit 330ml – 4.5S$ 
Charsiu Shoyu Soba (Ramen vị nước tương + nấm truffle): điểm đặc biệt ở đây là mình thấy nước lèo được sử dụng thêm nấm truffle để tăng hương vị. Vì cốt là nước tương Nhật nên vị thanh, unami nhiều, nước trong, mùi truffle cực kỳ nồng nha, nó không chỏi với các thành phần khác nhưng cảm giác nó át đi tất cả các hương vị khác. Đặc biệt ai không thích truffle thì không nên ghé đây. Miếng thịt xá xíu khá bự, béo, mềm, sợi mì mướt, không thực sự ấn tượng hay cảm nhận nó khác biệt so với các chuỗi nổi tiếng của Nhật.
Aji Charsiu Shiosoba (Ramen vị muối + truffle): nước lèo của tô dưới này cốt là muối nên cũng thanh, nhẹ, lạt hơn chút, cũng có mùi truffle nồng đậm. Vì mùi truffle quá nồng mình thấy 2 tô khá na ná nhau, không có sự khác biệt nhiều. Về hình thức thì nhìn tô Shio có vẻ béo hơn, nhưng thực ra vị không khác nhau mấy, trứng lòng đào đẹp, dẻo, đậm đà.
Aji Charsiu Shiosoba – 22.8S$ 
Yaki Gyoza: được chiên cháy xém 1 phần nên vừa giòn, vừa mềm, sốt chấm chua chua với chút ớt (cảm giác có vị tôm) hơi mặn mặn, không cay lắm. Ăn được.
Giá cả: trải nghiệm cho món ramen ở quán này không như mình kỳ vọng. Ngoài điểm nhấn là nấm truffle, mình thực sự không cảm nhận được sự cách biệt nhiều so với những tô ramen của các chuỗi nổi tiếng của Nhật :(((. Thêm vào đó, giá gần 400k chưa thuế, phí cho 1 tô ramen là quá mắc, đối với mình là không đáng, chỉ để trải nghiệm, không thích hợp để quay lại. Thiệt hại: ~71.44S$/ 2 người ~ 1tr200k VND/ 2 người. Giá trên hình/ menu chưa bao gồm 10% phí phục vụ và 7% GST (thuế ở Singapore)
Cảm ơn các bạn đã đọc bài viết. Hẹn gặp lại các bạn ở bài review tiếp theo.
Usagi
Рекомендую – купить метизы оптом и в розницу
Тут можно преобрести оружейные сейфы в москве оружейный шкаф купить москва
Тут можно преобрести шкаф для оружия цена сейф для сайги 12
Лучшие электрокарнизы для профессиональной сцены, сделают ваше выступление незабываемым.
Электрокарнизы – стильное решение для сцены, делая представление более динамичным.
Управляйте световыми шоу с помощью электрокарнизов, дарят возможность воплотить любую идею.
Лучшие электрокарнизы для профессиональных выступлений, для тех, кто ценит качество и стиль.
Электрокарнизы – современное решение для профессиональных выступлений, покоривших сердца зрителей.
Сверхсовременные технологии в каждом дизайне, сделать ваше выступление неповторимым.
Электрокарнизы – лучший выбор для сцены, и создадут неповторимую атмосферу.
Новейшие электрокарнизы для театральных постановок, для тех, кто стремится к совершенству.
Электрокарнизы – современное решение для сцены, с индивидуальным подходом к каждому проекту.
Сотни вариантов электрокарнизов для ваших выступлений, и удивить зрителей нестандартными решениями.
электрокарниз для театра электрокарниз для театра .
UTLH attracted me with several factors: a fixed 2% monthly return, no hidden fees, and blockchain transparency. I liked that the token isn’t just speculative, but has real-world applications. After just a few months, I recouped part of my investment, and now it’s all about growth!
Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
skraken market
Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.
Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.
An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.
The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.
And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”
Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.
The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.
Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
sПлощадка кракен
Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.
Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.
An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.
The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.
And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”
Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.
The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.
Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
sПлощадка кракен
Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.
Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.
An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.
The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.
And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”
Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.
The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.
I was curious if you ever thought of changing the structure of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?
Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
skraken войти
Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.
Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.
An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.
The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.
And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”
Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.
The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.
Тут можно преобрести навес для машин в Санкт-Петербурге подробно на сайте навес на дачу
Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
sПлощадка кракен
Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.
Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.
An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.
The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.
And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”
Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.
The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.
Тут можно преобрести навес металлический в Санкт-Петербурге подробно на сайте навес перед домом для машины
I do trust all the ideas you’ve presented on your post. They’re really convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are very quick for novices. May you please extend them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.|
Whats up very nice web site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds also? I am satisfied to seek out so many helpful information here within the submit, we want develop extra strategies on this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .|
Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage? My blog site is in the very same niche as yours and my visitors would definitely benefit from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks!|
May I just say what a relief to find somebody who actually knows what they are discussing on the internet. You actually realize how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people have to check this out and understand this side of your story. I was surprised you aren’t more popular since you certainly have the gift.|
I got this website from my buddy who told me concerning this website and at the moment this time I am browsing this website and reading very informative posts at this place.|
starting seo agency https://seo-agency-1.com/
Informative article, exactly what I needed.|