4 min39,419by Boss

Quán này tụi mình có dịp ăn bên chi nhánh Lý Tự Trọng rồi, thấy ăn rất ổn nên có giới thiệu vợ chồng đứa bạn. Đợt này đi 2 couples, ăn thử chi nhánh bên đây xem thế nào.

Địa chỉ:

Tầng 5 (L5-01), Vincom Landmark 81, 772 Điện Biên Phủ, P. 22, Q. Bình Thạnh, TP. HCM

Sau đây là 1 vài đánh giá của tụi mình:

Vị trí: trên tầng này có mỗi nhà hàng này thôi, y như “bao lầu”. Dưới tầng 4 là nhà hàng Hoa. Landmark đang hot nên mọi người đổ về đông, nhất là dịp cuối tuần, tụi mình có book trước mà quán không cho luôn.

Không gian: rộng hơn bên chi nhánh kia, nhưng mình cảm giác cách bố trí bàn ghế sát hơn, nên hơi ngộp hơn, lúc khách đông, nhân viên đông chạy đi chạy lại cảm giác chật chội. Trang trí 2 chi nhánh tương đồng, ấn tượng với áo Trung điện trưng bày ngay ngoài cửa (đẹp, sắc sảo, nhìn hàng thật đã…) quán trang trí nhìn sang, nhã, đậm phong cách Hàn.

Menu: ramen ở đây khá đa dạng, từ khô tới nước, từ tonkotsu (hầm xương heo), tới Miso, shoyu (nước tương). Bên cạnh đó có 1 số món phụ như cơm chiên, gyoza…

Phục vụ:

Lúc tới còn 6 tốp nữa mới tới lượt, tụi mình quyết định để tên lại, khi nào đến lượt nhân viên sẽ gọi lên. Chờ hơn 20 phút thì tới lượt, nhanh hơn tụi mình tưởng. Nhìn chung nhân viên lịch sự, nhưng cách nói chuyện cảm giác hơi chảnh.

Món ăn:

Đây là một trong những quán có panchan nhiều và ngon nhất, món yêu thích nhất là món tôm ngâm nước tương (chưa tìm thấy quán khác có món này) tôm mềm, thấm, dẻo, mặn ngọt vừa, ngon. Các loại salad với kim chi cũng rất ok.

Canh đậu tương: vị đậm đà, mùi hơi nặng hơn vài chỗ nhưng ăn quen thì ok, lại càng ngon ah, bắt mắt, ăn với cơm sẽ vừa hơn.

Canh đậu tương – 180k

Canh sườn bò: tô canh bự, cục sườn to chà bá, phần thịt được nấu lâu nên rục rồi, thịt mềm, nước canh ngọt thanh, thơm, có cả miến trong này. Món này ngon, nên thử.

Galbi-tang: canh sườn bò – 240k

Tụi mình gọi 1 phần Woo samyeopsal, 1 Samyeopsal, 1 phần sườn tươi, bánh sườn băm và rượu gạo vị đào, ham ăn nên thiếu mất vài món rồi.

  • Thịt ở đây chắc, ngon, bàn tụi mình có em bé nên nhờ nhân viên nướng dùm, chứ không nướng tại bàn. Thịt có thể chấm với sốt, muối, dầu mè… mỗi thứ đều có vị ngon riêng. Khay rau dài, nhiều, tươi xanh.
  • Bánh sườn băm: ăn hơi giống nem nướng của mình vị ngọt ngọt, có bột, mềm, ăn được chứ mình không thích món này lắm vì dễ ngán, chấm sốt giống mayonaise trộn mù tạt, hợp.
  • Rượu gạo đào thơm mùi đào lắm, không nồng mùi cồn, vị nhẹ, ngọt ngọt, thanh, dễ uống, ngon hơn loại thường ah.
  • Mì lạnh: sợi mì dai (thực ra thấy quán nào bán món này sợi cũng na ná nhau), nước thanh, mát, hơi lạt lạt, có dấm, mù tạt để nêm thêm. Món này ở đây ok, nhưng món này mình thích vị của 1 quán bên quận 7 hơn, đậm ngọt mát hơn.
  • Bánh sườn băm – 240k
  • Rượu gạo đào
  • Bornga Naengmyeon – Mì lạnh Bornga – 180k

Giá cả: Nhà hàng Hàn Quốc này thuộc loại giá cao, menu thịt hơi ít sự lựa chọn, nhưng mọi thứ đều chất lượng, vị làm giống bên Hàn và ngon, một phần đi từ 2-3 người ăn ok, 4 người cảm giác hơi thiếu. Có điều chi nhánh này mình không thích lắm. Nếu ăn lại sẽ ghé chi nhánh khác. Thiệt hại: 2tr564k/ 4 người. Giá trên hình/ menu là giá chưa bao gồm 10% VAT.

Cảm ơn các bạn đã đọc bài viết. Hẹn gặp các bạn ở bài review tiếp theo.

Usagi

0

6,801 thoughts on “[Hôm nay ăn gì?] Bornga – CN Landmark 81 – Đợi chờ là hạnh phúc”

  8. NASA scientists are in a state of anxious limbo after the Trump administration proposed a budget that would eliminate one of the United States’ top climate labs – the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, or GISS – as a standalone entity.
    kra34 cc
    In its place, it would move some of the lab’s functions into a broader environmental modeling effort across the agency.

    Career specialists are now working remotely, awaiting details and even more unsure about their future at the lab after they were kicked out of their longtime home in New York City last week. Closing the lab for good could jeopardize its value and the country’s leadership role in global climate science, sources say.

    “It’s an absolute sh*tshow,” one GISS scientist said under condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. “Morale at GISS has never been lower, and it feels for all of us that we are being abandoned by NASA leadership.”

    “We are supposedly going to be integrated into this new virtual NASA modeling institute, but (we have) no idea what that will actually look like,” they said.

    NASA is defending its budget proposal, with a nod toward the lab’s future.
    “NASA’s GISS has a significant place in the history of space science and its work is critical for the Earth Science Division, particularly as the division looks to the future of its modeling work and capabilities,” NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner said in a statement.

    “Fundamental contributions in research and applications from GISS directly impact daily life by showing the Earth system connections that impact the air we breathe, our health, the food we grow, and the cities we live in,” Warner said.

    GISS has a storied history in climate science on the global scale.

    James Hansen, a former director, first called national attention to human-caused global warming at a Senate hearing during the hot summer of 1988. The lab, founded in 1961, is still known worldwide for its computer modeling of the planet that enable scientists to make projections for how climate change may affect global temperatures, precipitation, extreme weather events and other variables.

    Reply

  11. NASA scientists are in a state of anxious limbo after the Trump administration proposed a budget that would eliminate one of the United States’ top climate labs – the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, or GISS – as a standalone entity.
    kra34.cc
    In its place, it would move some of the lab’s functions into a broader environmental modeling effort across the agency.

    Career specialists are now working remotely, awaiting details and even more unsure about their future at the lab after they were kicked out of their longtime home in New York City last week. Closing the lab for good could jeopardize its value and the country’s leadership role in global climate science, sources say.

    “It’s an absolute sh*tshow,” one GISS scientist said under condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. “Morale at GISS has never been lower, and it feels for all of us that we are being abandoned by NASA leadership.”

    “We are supposedly going to be integrated into this new virtual NASA modeling institute, but (we have) no idea what that will actually look like,” they said.

    NASA is defending its budget proposal, with a nod toward the lab’s future.
    “NASA’s GISS has a significant place in the history of space science and its work is critical for the Earth Science Division, particularly as the division looks to the future of its modeling work and capabilities,” NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner said in a statement.

    “Fundamental contributions in research and applications from GISS directly impact daily life by showing the Earth system connections that impact the air we breathe, our health, the food we grow, and the cities we live in,” Warner said.

    GISS has a storied history in climate science on the global scale.

    James Hansen, a former director, first called national attention to human-caused global warming at a Senate hearing during the hot summer of 1988. The lab, founded in 1961, is still known worldwide for its computer modeling of the planet that enable scientists to make projections for how climate change may affect global temperatures, precipitation, extreme weather events and other variables.

    Reply

  15. NASA scientists are in a state of anxious limbo after the Trump administration proposed a budget that would eliminate one of the United States’ top climate labs – the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, or GISS – as a standalone entity.
    kra35.cc
    In its place, it would move some of the lab’s functions into a broader environmental modeling effort across the agency.

    Career specialists are now working remotely, awaiting details and even more unsure about their future at the lab after they were kicked out of their longtime home in New York City last week. Closing the lab for good could jeopardize its value and the country’s leadership role in global climate science, sources say.

    “It’s an absolute sh*tshow,” one GISS scientist said under condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. “Morale at GISS has never been lower, and it feels for all of us that we are being abandoned by NASA leadership.”

    “We are supposedly going to be integrated into this new virtual NASA modeling institute, but (we have) no idea what that will actually look like,” they said.

    NASA is defending its budget proposal, with a nod toward the lab’s future.
    “NASA’s GISS has a significant place in the history of space science and its work is critical for the Earth Science Division, particularly as the division looks to the future of its modeling work and capabilities,” NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner said in a statement.

    “Fundamental contributions in research and applications from GISS directly impact daily life by showing the Earth system connections that impact the air we breathe, our health, the food we grow, and the cities we live in,” Warner said.

    GISS has a storied history in climate science on the global scale.

    James Hansen, a former director, first called national attention to human-caused global warming at a Senate hearing during the hot summer of 1988. The lab, founded in 1961, is still known worldwide for its computer modeling of the planet that enable scientists to make projections for how climate change may affect global temperatures, precipitation, extreme weather events and other variables.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *